For HOA boards and community managers
Is an HOA liable for crime in the community in California?
Short answer
It can be. California courts have held that an association, like a landlord, has a duty to take reasonable steps against crime it knows about or should foresee in common areas. The leading case is Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Association (1986). A board that ignores repeated incidents carries more risk than one that documents what it did.
What the duty looks like in practice
An association is not an insurer of safety. Nobody expects a board to prevent every crime. The question a court asks is whether the harm was foreseeable and whether the board acted reasonably once it knew.
Foreseeable usually means prior similar incidents: a string of car break-ins in the same garage, repeated reports of a broken gate, earlier assaults in a dark parking area. Once those are in the minutes or the manager's inbox, doing nothing is the risky choice.
What reasonable boards do
- Keep a log of every reported incident, with date and location
- Fix lighting, gates and locks quickly and record the repair
- Get a professional assessment and discuss it in an open meeting
- If patrol is hired, keep the reports and act on what they recommend
- Tell residents what the association does and does not provide
Where security fits
Patrol does two jobs for a board. It deters, and it creates a dated record that the association took the problem seriously. That record is often what association counsel asks for first. Our HOA patrol sends a report after every shift and a monthly summary for the board packet.
This is general information from a security company, not legal advice. Laws change and details matter, so confirm anything important with your attorney.
Talk to the owner, not a call center.
Call any hour. Michael or a supervisor answers, asks a few questions, and you have a written quote within about two hours.